City-Level Decoupling-Full Report

Figure 4.2 Typology of urban metabolic profiles 65 Figure 4.3 Typology of urban metabolic profiles

7

Sana’a Freetown Kinshasa

Dar es Salaam Bangui Ouagadougou Yangon Addis Ababa Accra

Kathmandu Cali Porto Alegre Cebu San Salvador Quezon city Panama city Manila

Rabat Casablanca Bishkek

Bogota Asuncion Montevideo

Bangalore Hyderabad Chennal

Nagoya Osaka Yokohama

Brasilia Belo Horizonte Beijing

6

Bujumbura Banjul Dhaka Colombo Naihati Surabaya Kolkata Jakarta Phnom Penh

Conakry Florianopolis Santo Domingo

Durban Curitiba Riga Beirut

Ho Chi Minh

Tokyo

Ankara Shenzhen

Abuja Delhi Cairo

Bangkok Istanbul Guadalajara Mexico city

5

Niamey Bamako

Tunis Lima

Vilnius Amman Ulaanbaatar Sao Paulo

Dakar

4

Mumbai Lagos Karachi

3

Islamabad Damascus Tbilisi

Nairoby Guatemala city Antananarivo Chisinau Quito

2

1

Low=1,Low/Med=1.5, Med=2,Med/High=2.5,High=3

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

CO2

Electricity

Total energy

Industrial minerals

Construction mineral

Fossil Fuels

Water Figure 4.4 Typology of urban metabolic profiles Total DMC

Biomass

8

Jerusalem Hamburg Copenhagen Moscow Seattle, WA Port-of-Spain Amsterdam Los Angeles, CA New York, NY Helsinki

Belgrade Tripoli Sarajevo Bucharest Teheran Minsk Budapest Lisbon Buenos Aires

London Milan Caracas Barcelona Madrid Kuala Lumpur Rome

Johannesburg Guangzhou Shanghai Tashkent Tel Aviv Cape town St. Petersburg

Geneve Bern Vienna Ljubljana

Anchorage, AK Boston, MA Phoenix, AZ Montreal Detroit, MI Vancouver, BC Monolulu, MI Toronto

BS Begawan Riyadh Manama Abu Dabhi Kuwait city Doha

7

Paris Seoul Stockholm Dubai Brussels Victoria, BC Ottawa

6

Kiev Kingston

Melbourne Chicago, IL Sydney Denver, CO

5

Vladivostok Santiago Warsaw Sofia

4

Athens Dublin Prague Berlin

3

2

1

0

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

Low=1,Low/Med=1.5, Med=2,Med/High=2.5,High=3

CO2

Electricity

Total energy

Industrial minerals

Construction mineral

Fossil Fuels

Biomass

Total DMC

Water

Source: Saldivar-Sali, A.N.D. 2010

40