Workshop on the World Ocean Assessment

18

Description of the Workshop

At the end of the workshop, participants were of- fered the opportunity to provide commentary and feedback on any aspect of the workshop. The com- ments from individual participants were captured in real-time visible to the participants, and are sum- marised below, with, where appropriate, comments (post-workshop) in reply by the Moderator. Comments made by participants on the overall value of this workshop to South China Sea region

level of scientific robustness that was request- ed by some participants. The methodology is a process to rapidly harvest opinion, not investi- gate the detail of the science, and is matched to the type and detail of information generally required by decision-makers within a typical na- tional or regional policy setting framework. • It is hard work to come up with an integrated as- sessment even at the regional level. An assessment at the global level will be even harder! • It is recommended that before such a workshop the participants should do their homework. Get familiar with the area before the workshop, and get early access to data. Moderator: selecting indicators for which there is a strong set of data is fatal to expert elicitation procedures in this form of decision model, which is explicitly designed to operate in a mixture of data-rich and data-poor situa- tions – if this suggestion were to be followed, there is no need for this form of workshop or methodology. Participants were invited to com- ment on the full set of parameters and indica- tors prior to the workshop, and although few chose to engage in that opportunity, a number did engage in the detail, and the list of param- eters assessed at the workshop can be reason- ably assumed to cover a substantive proportion of the biodiversity and ecosystem health assets and values of the SCS. • Methodology is interesting approach. Perhaps could be conducted at a smaller scale in the coun- tries first; this could be better and then combine to make a regional assessment. Parameters—some are not applicable, so a revision is needed. • Key species driving ecosystem change are differ- ent in SCS than in Australia. Participants need ba- sic data before the workshop, and the secretariat needs to list important databases for this analysis. Needs to be chemical, biological etc. NOWPAP region consists of four countries – could use this methodology in that region where data are scarce. Moderator: the methodology is based on key • Methodology – too many parameters – perhaps se- lect some indicators for this region.

• Most of the participants are now familiar with method

• Participants improved the methodology in some important aspects

• It is difficult to come up with assessment on this scale – there is a disconnect with local level. Better data, images, maps, ports distribution etc would have been a big help, so there is a need for ad- ditional resource material to be available prior to the workshop. Moderator: participants were advised to bring with them any data and information that might be relevant to the issues; now that par- ticipants understand the scale and detail of in- formation for this type of assessment, then this request may be clearer for future workshops of this type. • The large area of the SCS was difficult to cover. These three days represent an initial step in as- sessment of SCS. There are many issues that need to be considered. After three days there is only a weak scientific basis. After group discussion some criteria are considered to be weak, although this can be changed based on individual views. There is still confusion. The assessment wasn’t correct for inclusion in the WOA because it lacks accuracy. Information from countries is needed for initial information for each working group to consider. Need a lot of consultation amongst countries af- ter this meeting to determine if this methodology can be used. Moderator: participants were guided through the rapid assessment methodology – while it is their scientific opinion that was being sought, no assessment of this scale could achieve the