The Socio-Economics of the West, Central and Southern African Coastal Communities

Appendix H (continued)

Economic Instruments

Relevant Material

Financing Biodiversity Conservation with Government and Donor Funds and Market-Based Fees - Attracting government, ODA and private charity, - Debt-for-nature swaps -Benefit sharing and revenue sharing -Biodiversity enterprise funds (BEFs) -Tourist charges

Gutman, P. and S. Davidson (2008). A reviewof innovative international financial mechanisms for biodiversity conservation, with a special focus on the international financing of developing countries’ protected areas , WWF-MPO. http://assets.panda.org/downloads/final_z.pdf Emerton, L., Bishop, J. and Thomas, L. (2006). Sustainable Financing of Protected Areas: A global review of challenges and options. IUCN, https://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/ emerton_et_al_2006.pdf The OECD Environment Programme (2003). Harnessing Markets for Biodiversity: Towards Conservation and Sustainable Use. OECD Publishing, http://chm.moew.government. bg/nnps/upload/Common/Baurle_literature_NOF/Local Publish/OECD_Harnessing_ Markets_for_Biodiversity.pdf UNDP/GEF and the Zambian Ministry of Tourism, Environment and Natural Resources, (2004). A financial and economic analysis of the costs and benefits of managing the Protected Area. Development Services and Initiatives. http://fsg.afre.msu.edu/zambia/ resources/Economic Analysis of Protected Areas1 zambia report.pdf Ali, P. A. U. and K. Yano (2004). Eco-finance: The legal design and regulation of market- based environmental instruments. The Hague: Kluwer Law International. http://www. worldcat.org/title/eco-finance-the-legal-design-and-regulation-of-market-based- environmental-instruments/oclc/56413492 R. Gillepsie and D. Hill (2007) Habitat Banking – a new look at nature and development mitigation.Town & Country Planning 76:4, pp. 121-125. http://www.environmentbank. com/docs/TCPA_HBplusCov.pdf

-Resource extraction fees -Bioprospecting charges -Habitat banking Interwies (2011), pp. 69-76.

Spang, W. D.; Reister, S. (2005): Ökokonten und Kompensationsflächenpools in der Bauleitplanung und der Fachplanung, Berlin.

Böhme, C. ; Bruns, El. et al. (2005): Flächen und Maßnahmenpools in Deutschland, Bonn.

Payment for Ecosystem Services PES schemes are mutually beneficial contracts between suppliers and consumers of ecosystem services. Interwies (2011), p. 53-54; 75

Wunder, S. (2005). Payments for environmental services: Some nuts and bolts. Center for International Forestry Research, http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_files/ OccPapers/OP-42.pdf Smith, M., de Groot, D., Perrot-Maîte, D. and Bergkamp, G. (2006). Establishing payments for watershed services . IUCN, Switzerland, https://portals.iucn.org/library/ efiles/edocs/2006-054.pdf

Hope, R. A. et al (2007). Negotiating watershed services. International Institute for Environment and Development, http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/15508IIED.pdf

Duraiappah, A. K. (2006). Markets for Ecosystem Services – A Potential Tool for Multilateral Environmental Agreements . International Institute for Sustainable Development, https:// www.cbd.int/doc/external/iisd/iisd-economics-ecosystem-ens.pdf The GEF (2008). Financing the Stewardship of Global Biodiversity, Global Environmental Facility. http://www.thegef.org/gef/sites/thegef.org/files/publication/financing- stewardship-global-biodiversity.pdf WWF (2003). FromGoodwilltoPaymentsforEnvironmentalServices:ASurveyofFinancing Options for Sustainable Natural Resource Management in Developing Countries , Edited by Pablo Gutman. Macroeconomics for Sustainable Development Programme Office, http://assets.panda.org/downloads/fin_alt.pdf Shilling J.D. and J. Osha (2003). Paying for Environmental Stewardship – Using Markets and Common-Pool Property to Reduce Rural Poverty while Enhancing Conservation , Technical paper, Economic Change, Poverty, and the Environment.

Washington, DC: Macroeconomics for Sustainable Development Program Office, WorldWildlife Fund. http://www.panda.org/downloads/policy/shilling.pdf

Source: Interwies (2011).

59