Evolving Roles of Blue, Green, and Grey Water in Agriculture

13

Mubako

Table 1. The 25 most important papers included in the 192 records downloaded from the Web of Science ranked using the NAILS toolkit.*

Broad Study Approach / Assessment Framework

Study Region / Country

Focus: Blue, Green, or Grey Water

Scale / Location

Specific Techniques Used

Rank Year

Reference

Water Footprint Assessment, VIVA methodology

Production perspective, Tier III approach for grey water footprint

Lamastra et al. (2014)

13

2014 Italy

Local/Sicily

Green, Grey

Water Footprint Assessment

Production systems, feed composition

de Miguel et al. (2015) Gerbens- Leenes and Hoekstra (2012)

14

2015 Spain

Region/Spain Blue, Green, Grey

Blue, Green, Grey

Water Footprint Assessment

15

2012 Global

Global

Production perspective

Water Footprint Assessment, Hydrological water balance method

2011 New

Region/ New Zealand

Blue, Green, Grey

Production perspective, water balance

Deurer et al. (2011)

16

Zealand

Blue, Green, Grey Blue, Green, Grey Blue, Green, Grey Blue, Green, Grey Blue, Green, Grey Blue, Green, Grey

Life Cycle Assessment

Production chain analysis

Ene et al. (2013)

17

2013 Romania Region/ Romaina

Schyns and Hoekstra (2014)

Water Footprint Assessment

Grid-based, spatially explicit Logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) decomposition method Water balance model, nitrate pollution dilution Environmental impact assessment, model irrigation requirements Production weighted average Consumption perspective, freshwater

18

2014 Morocco Region/ Morocco

Local/ Beijing Local/ Districts Local/ Noord- Brabant

Water Footprint Assessment Water Footprint Assessment

Xu et al. (2015)

19

2015 China

Shrestha et al. (2013) De Boer et al. (2013) Pahlow et al. (2015)

20

2013 Nepal

Life Cycle Assessment

21

2013 Netherlands

Water Footprint Assessment

22

2015 Global

Global

Water Footprint Assessment, Life Cycle Assessment Hydrological water balance method

2013 New

Region/New Zealand

Blue, Green, Grey

Herath et al. (2013b)

23

ecosystem impact method, freshwater depletion method

Zealand

Region/South Africa

Water Footprint Assessment Water Footprint Assessment

Haggard et al. (2015) Bulsink et al. (2010)

24

2015 South Africa

Blue, Grey

Direct water footprint

Region/ Indonesia

Blue, Green, Grey

National water-use accounting

25

2010 Indonesia

*The 25 most important papers is an analysis of records downloaded from the Web of Science. The analysis identifies the 25 most important authors, journals, and keywords in the dataset based on the number of occurrences and citation counts. A citation network of the provided records is created and used to identify the important papers according to their in-degree, total citation count, and page rank scores according to the procedure described in Knutas et al. (2015).

UCOWR

Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education

Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online