Evolving Roles of Blue, Green, and Grey Water in Agriculture
13
Mubako
Table 1. The 25 most important papers included in the 192 records downloaded from the Web of Science ranked using the NAILS toolkit.*
Broad Study Approach / Assessment Framework
Study Region / Country
Focus: Blue, Green, or Grey Water
Scale / Location
Specific Techniques Used
Rank Year
Reference
Water Footprint Assessment, VIVA methodology
Production perspective, Tier III approach for grey water footprint
Lamastra et al. (2014)
13
2014 Italy
Local/Sicily
Green, Grey
Water Footprint Assessment
Production systems, feed composition
de Miguel et al. (2015) Gerbens- Leenes and Hoekstra (2012)
14
2015 Spain
Region/Spain Blue, Green, Grey
Blue, Green, Grey
Water Footprint Assessment
15
2012 Global
Global
Production perspective
Water Footprint Assessment, Hydrological water balance method
2011 New
Region/ New Zealand
Blue, Green, Grey
Production perspective, water balance
Deurer et al. (2011)
16
Zealand
Blue, Green, Grey Blue, Green, Grey Blue, Green, Grey Blue, Green, Grey Blue, Green, Grey Blue, Green, Grey
Life Cycle Assessment
Production chain analysis
Ene et al. (2013)
17
2013 Romania Region/ Romaina
Schyns and Hoekstra (2014)
Water Footprint Assessment
Grid-based, spatially explicit Logarithmic mean Divisia index (LMDI) decomposition method Water balance model, nitrate pollution dilution Environmental impact assessment, model irrigation requirements Production weighted average Consumption perspective, freshwater
18
2014 Morocco Region/ Morocco
Local/ Beijing Local/ Districts Local/ Noord- Brabant
Water Footprint Assessment Water Footprint Assessment
Xu et al. (2015)
19
2015 China
Shrestha et al. (2013) De Boer et al. (2013) Pahlow et al. (2015)
20
2013 Nepal
Life Cycle Assessment
21
2013 Netherlands
Water Footprint Assessment
22
2015 Global
Global
Water Footprint Assessment, Life Cycle Assessment Hydrological water balance method
2013 New
Region/New Zealand
Blue, Green, Grey
Herath et al. (2013b)
23
ecosystem impact method, freshwater depletion method
Zealand
Region/South Africa
Water Footprint Assessment Water Footprint Assessment
Haggard et al. (2015) Bulsink et al. (2010)
24
2015 South Africa
Blue, Grey
Direct water footprint
Region/ Indonesia
Blue, Green, Grey
National water-use accounting
25
2010 Indonesia
*The 25 most important papers is an analysis of records downloaded from the Web of Science. The analysis identifies the 25 most important authors, journals, and keywords in the dataset based on the number of occurrences and citation counts. A citation network of the provided records is created and used to identify the important papers according to their in-degree, total citation count, and page rank scores according to the procedure described in Knutas et al. (2015).
UCOWR
Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education
Made with FlippingBook - professional solution for displaying marketing and sales documents online